Find an Attorney
An expert in assisted reproductive technology law will help ensure that your family building matter proceeds smoothly. Our Online Adoption and ART Academy Member Directory lists the current fellows of the American Academy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Attorneys in each State.
If you are interested in learning about building your family through adoption, please visit us at the clicking here gets you to the American Academy of Adoption Attorneys Website.
Interested in Joining AAARTA?
Who's Who In AAARTA
Director, Margaret Swain
Deputy Director, Nidhi Desai
Legislative Committee Chair, Kurt Hughes
Executive Administrator, Jennie Sullivan
Recent ART related cases:
Missouri: McQueen v. Gadbury (Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, No. ED103138, 11/15/2016). This is a case of disputed dispositional authority over cryopreserved embryos in a divorce, and an attempt by the wife to classify the embryos as persons. The mid-level appeals court affirmed the trial court’s judgment that frozen pre-embryos are marital property of a ‘special character’ and that the parties jointly hold rights to them and that they may not be used or released without the consent of both parties. The argument that the pre-embryos are children was found to have no merit and the trial court did not err in failing to classify the frozen pre-embryos as children under Missouri law.
Kansas: State of Kansas et al v. W.M. and A.B., 11/22/2016 (District Court of Shawnee County, Case No. 2012DM2686)
A man replied to an ad for a sperm donor on Craigslist. He provided his sperm to an unmarried lesbian couple who, without medical intervention, inseminated one of the partners. After the child was born, the partners separated and the custodial mother applied for state benefits. The state sued for paternity determination and reimbursement of child support from the donor. Kansas law requires medical involvement for a provider of sperm to be considered a donor. The court considered the best interests of the child and who, as between the donor and the non-custodial parent, had the “weightier” parental rights and responsibilities. The court held that the donor was not a parent and therefore, had no duty to repay the state.
Texas: In the Interest of P.S., a Child, 2016, Tex.App. LEXUS 11657 (2nd District Court of Appeals of TX, 10/27/2016). A man provided his sperm to a female friend by delivering the specimen in a cup directly to the woman. He had agreed that it would be used for insemination, which was done without any medical oversight or intervention. A child was conceived in this way, and the man was involved with the child for a period of time until the mother refused him access to the child. She rescinded the acknowledgement of paternity and asked him to relinquish his rights. He sought to be declared the father of the child. Texas law required that if a man is to be considered a donor with no rights or responsibilities to the child, then his sperm must be provided to a licensed physician for use in ‘assisted reproduction’. Here, the court held that the man was a parent, not a donor.
Maryland: The Court of Appeals, MD's highest appeals court, issued its opinion: "De facto parents have standing to contest custody or visitation and need not show parental unfitness or exceptional circumstances before a trial court can apply a best interests of the child analysis. The Court’s previous decision in Janice M. v. Margaret K., 404 Md. 661 (2008), is overruled." Conover v. Conover
ART Legislative Updates
AAARTA's legislative committee analyzes and responds to bills as they are introduced in the various state legislatures. This section provides periodic updates.
Federal Bill "Providing Certainty for Progenitors Act of 2016":
AAARTA Director's Comment
Academy supports improved fertility and adoption benefits for America's veterans. Press Release - VA bill
Events in 2017-2018
Webinars for Purchase
The Academy provides its webinars on Adoption and ART law for purchase. To see the available webinars click: Webinars on ART and Adoption.
Montreal Sponsor/Exhibitor Registration
The Academy’s 2017 annual meeting is being held in beautiful, historic Montréal, Canada, May 7 - 10, 2017. We hope you will join us!
Please check out the Registration Form to see what is being offered this year! In addition to new and creative sponsorship opportunities, we have included increased sponsor benefits and, as a way to thank you for committing early to the success of our conference, we are offering EARLY BIRD DISCOUNTS through December 31!
For sponsors and exhibitor who wish to commit to joining us at both our annual meeting and our Mid-Year in Anaheim, California - September 16 - 19, 2017, we are also offering discounts. The Mid-Year will be an ART conference for attorneys (Fellows and non-Fellows), and also include an ART Paralegal Program that will precede the Attorney Program. If you are interested, please give Jennie Sullivan a call at 317-407-8422 to discuss the additional incentives available.
As always, thank you for your generous support of the Academy - we value your friendship and contribution to the success of the Academy.
ACI Infertility Center of Excellence Conference
February 9-10, 2017
San Diego, CA
ASRM Advocacy Academy
March 9-10, 2017
April 7-8, 2017
Cosa Mesa, CA
ABA Family Law Section 2017 Spring CLE Conference
May 3-6, 2017
RESOLVE Advocacy Day
May 18, 2017
Jefferson Infertility Counseling Conference
May 31-June 2, 2017
Academy Mid-Year Conference on ART
September 17-19, 2017
Details to follow
ABA Family Law Section 2017 Fall CLE ConferenceOctober 4-7, 2017
Beaver Creek Mountain, CO
ASRM Annual Scientific Congress and Expo
October 17 - November 21, 2017
San Antonio, Texas
ABA Family Law 2018 Spring CLE Conference
May 9-12, 2018
For further information concerning ABA events, please contact: Cynthia (“Cindy”) G. Swan, Director – Section of Family Law, American Bar Association | 321 North Clark Street | Chicago, IL 60654, Office Direct: 312.988.5619 | Cell: 773.490.9320, email@example.com | www.americanbar.org.